SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE

Winning the battle for premium air travel

Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.

Competitive strategy

Scenario planning

Four Corners analysis

Resource allocation

1st place

MY ROLE

Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation

COMPANY

SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by faculty and industry

TIMELINE

Two-day live simulation

OUTCOMES

1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight

TEAM

Team #2 with Aditya Mehta, Karla Muñoz, Juan Pablo Ochoa Rouhana, Itziar Olóriz, and Trenton Bright

OVERVIEW

A live war game, in two rounds.

The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.

THE TEAM

SMU Cox School of Business

Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright

IPADE Business School

Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo

Ochoa Rouhana

SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES

British Airways (us)

Emirates

Qatar Airways

Air India

Lufthansa

American Airlines

ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE

Build the strategy

Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.

→

ROUND 2 · REACTIVE

5 live crises, little prep

Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK

British Airways:

Strategic Plan 2026–2028

Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.

1st of 6

SMU Cox War Game · Team of six

THE CHALLENGE

British Airways is squeezed from every direction.

Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We argued BA should make none of the obvious moves.

HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.

ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY

Three strategic pillars.

HOW WE FRAMED IT

Five questions, answered in order.

We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.

1

FRAMING

What is our winning aspiration?

Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.

2

POSITIONING

Where will we play?

Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.

3

POSITIONING

How will we win?

Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.

4

ACTIVATION

What capabilities must we have?

Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.

5

ACTIVATION

What systems do we need?

Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.

HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS

​

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Low cost

Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper

Can’t match its structurally lower fares

Regulatory risk

US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk

Fully compliant Western carrier

Corporate access

None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched

Preferred carrier for Western multinationals

Loyalty

No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch

Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned

Track record

A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk

Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%

Hub strength

Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa

Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway

Geopolitics

Formed after failed Iran-US talks

UK and NATO aligned

Reputation

New, and a risk for US corporate clients

Safe, stable, premium, and punctual

Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.

01

PILLAR 01

Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.

Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

20 to 30% cheaper fuel

Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Fully compliant

UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

VS

THE TRADEOFF

We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.

02

PILLAR 02

Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.

Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.

14M

Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.

Faster Avios upgrades

Long-term corporate contracts

AI-driven personalization

Guaranteed fast-track security

THE TRADEOFF

Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.

03

PILLAR 03

Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.

Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.

43%

Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.

LHR

London Heathrow

JFK

New York

US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors

Asia-Europe: conceded

THE TRADEOFF

We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.

THE THREE-YEAR PLAN

How the pillars roll out.

2026

FIRST 6 MONTHS

Establish and intercept

Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.

2027

YEAR 2

Deepen and differentiate

Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.

2028

YEAR 3

Compound and defend

Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.

HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028

01

Premium cabin

load factor

02

Corporate account

retention

03

On-time performance

above 86%

04

Avios active

corporate accounts

THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN

Premium

vs. volume

Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.

Fleet

vs. cash

Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.

Alliance depth

vs. independence

Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.

ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS

Five live scenarios with no prep time.

Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.

EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR

Trust +

compliance

Corporate

lock-in

Heathrow +

Atlantic

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

02

Market share loss to Equinox

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

05

Fuel supply threatened

​

THE CURVEBALL

OUR RESPONSE

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

02

Market share loss to Equinox

Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

05

Fuel supply threatened

Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT

Premium differentiation

Faster boarding through security partnerships

Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges

Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences

A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers

Reinforce alliances

Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes

Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners

Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey

Secure fuel

Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options

Invest in sustainable aviation fuel

Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East

Fly newer, more efficient aircraft

FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK

HOW WE BUILT IT

Predicting competitors’ next moves.

We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.

I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.

FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE

WHAT THEY WANT

Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.

WHAT THEY’RE DOING

Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.

WHAT THEY ASSUME

Allegris delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.

WHAT THEY CAN DO

Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.

The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT

1st of 6

Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.

RETROSPECTIVE

What I’d do differently.

01

Work the short-haul question through.

We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.

02

Get specific on winning corporate contracts.

The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.

THE PM TAKEAWAY

Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.

You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.

LET’S TALK

Building for real people

at scale?

I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. LinkedIn is the fastest way to reach me.

NEXT CASE STUDY

Twofer →

Designing real-time demand for local businesses.

SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE

Winning the battle for premium air travel

Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.

Competitive strategy

Scenario planning

Four Corners analysis

Resource allocation

1st place

MY ROLE

Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation

COMPANY

SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by faculty and industry

TIMELINE

Two-day live simulation

OUTCOMES

1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight

TEAM

A 6-person team with various industry backgrounds and strengths

OVERVIEW

A live war game, in two rounds.

The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.

THE TEAM

SMU Cox School of Business

Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright

IPADE Business School

Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo

Ochoa Rouhana

SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES

British Airways (us)

Emirates

Qatar Airways

Air India

Lufthansa

American Airlines

ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE

Build the strategy

Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.

→

ROUND 2 · REACTIVE

5 live crises, little prep

Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK

British Airways:

Strategic Plan 2026–2028

Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.

1st of 6

SMU Cox War Game · Team of six

THE CHALLENGE

British Airways is squeezed from every direction.

Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We contended BA should make none of the obvious moves.

HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.

ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY

Three strategic pillars.

HOW WE FRAMED IT

Five questions, answered in order.

We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.

1

FRAMING

What is our winning aspiration?

Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.

2

POSITIONING

Where will we play?

Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.

3

POSITIONING

How will we win?

Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.

4

ACTIVATION

What capabilities must we have?

Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.

5

ACTIVATION

What systems do we need?

Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.

HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS

​

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Low cost

Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper

Can’t match its structurally lower fares

Regulatory risk

US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk

Fully compliant Western carrier

Corporate access

None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched

Preferred carrier for Western multinationals

Loyalty

No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch

Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned

Track record

A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk

Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%

Hub strength

Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa

Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway

Geopolitics

Formed after failed Iran-US talks

UK and NATO aligned

Reputation

New, and a risk for US corporate clients

Safe, stable, premium, and punctual

Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.

01

PILLAR 01

Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.

Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

20 to 30% cheaper fuel

Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Fully compliant

UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

VS

THE TRADEOFF

We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.

02

PILLAR 02

Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.

Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.

14M

Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.

Faster Avios upgrades

Long-term corporate contracts

AI-driven personalization

Guaranteed fast-track security

THE TRADEOFF

Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.

03

PILLAR 03

Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.

Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.

43%

Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.

LHR

London Heathrow

JFK

New York

US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors

Asia-Europe: conceded

THE TRADEOFF

We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.

THE THREE-YEAR PLAN

How the pillars roll out.

2026

FIRST 6 MONTHS

Establish and intercept

Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.

2027

YEAR 2

Deepen and differentiate

Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.

2028

YEAR 3

Compound and defend

Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.

HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028

01

Premium cabin

load factor

02

Corporate account

retention

03

On-time performance

above 86%

04

Avios active

corporate accounts

THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN

Premium

vs. volume

Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.

Fleet

vs. cash

Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.

Alliance depth

vs. independence

Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.

ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS

Five live scenarios with no prep time.

Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.

EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR

Trust +

compliance

Corporate

lock-in

Heathrow +

Atlantic

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

02

Market share loss to Equinox

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

05

Fuel supply threatened

​

THE CURVEBALL

OUR RESPONSE

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

02

Market share loss to Equinox

Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

05

Fuel supply threatened

Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT

Premium differentiation

Faster boarding through security partnerships

Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges

Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences

A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers

Reinforce alliances

Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes

Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners

Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey

Secure fuel

Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options

Invest in sustainable aviation fuel

Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East

Fly newer, more efficient aircraft

FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK

HOW WE BUILT IT

Predicting competitors’ next moves.

We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.

I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.

FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE

WHAT THEY WANT

Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.

WHAT THEY’RE DOING

Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.

WHAT THEY ASSUME

Allegris, Lufthansa's customer-centric solution to personalized airfare, delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.

WHAT THEY CAN DO

Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.

The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT

1st of 6

Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.

RETROSPECTIVE

What I’d do differently.

01

Work the short-haul question through.

We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.

02

Get specific on winning corporate contracts.

The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.

THE PM TAKEAWAY

Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.

You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.

LET’S TALK

Building for real people

at scale?

I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. LinkedIn is the fastest way to reach me.

NEXT CASE STUDY

Twofer →

Designing real-time demand for local businesses.

SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE

Winning the battle for

premium air travel

Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.

Competitive strategy

Scenario planning

Four Corners analysis

Resource allocation

1st place

MY ROLE

Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation

COMPANY

SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by industry experts

TIMELINE

Two-day live simulation

OUTCOMES

1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight

TEAM

A 6-person team with various industry backgrounds and strengths

OVERVIEW

A live war game, in two rounds.

The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.

THE TEAM

SMU Cox School of Business

Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright

IPADE Business School

Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo

Ochoa Rouhana

SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES

British Airways (us)

Emirates

Qatar Airways

Air India

Lufthansa

American Airlines

ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE

Build the strategy

Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.

→

ROUND 2 · REACTIVE

5 live crises, little prep

Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK

British Airways:

Strategic Plan 2026–2028

Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.

1st of 6

SMU Cox War Game · Team of six

THE CHALLENGE

British Airways is squeezed from every direction.

Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We contended BA should make none of the obvious moves.

HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.

ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY

Three strategic pillars.

HOW WE FRAMED IT

Five questions, answered in order.

We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.

1

FRAMING

What is our winning aspiration?

Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.

2

POSITIONING

Where will we play?

Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.

3

POSITIONING

How will we win?

Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.

4

ACTIVATION

What capabilities must we have?

Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.

5

ACTIVATION

What systems do we need?

Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.

HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS

​

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Low cost

Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper

Can’t match its structurally lower fares

Regulatory risk

US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk

Fully compliant Western carrier

Corporate access

None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched

Preferred carrier for Western multinationals

Loyalty

No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch

Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned

Track record

A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk

Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%

Hub strength

Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa

Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway

Geopolitics

Formed after failed Iran-US talks

UK and NATO aligned

Reputation

New, and a risk for US corporate clients

Safe, stable, premium, and punctual

Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.

01

PILLAR 01

Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.

Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

20 to 30% cheaper fuel

Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Fully compliant

UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

VS

THE TRADEOFF

We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.

02

PILLAR 02

Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.

Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.

14M

Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.

Faster Avios upgrades

Long-term corporate contracts

AI-driven personalization

Guaranteed fast-track security

THE TRADEOFF

Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.

03

PILLAR 03

Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.

Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.

43%

Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.

LHR

London Heathrow

JFK

New York

US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors

Asia-Europe: conceded

THE TRADEOFF

We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.

THE THREE-YEAR PLAN

How the pillars roll out.

2026

FIRST 6 MONTHS

Establish and intercept

Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.

2027

YEAR 2

Deepen and differentiate

Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.

2028

YEAR 3

Compound and defend

Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.

HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028

01

Premium cabin

load factor

02

Corporate account

retention

03

On-time performance

above 86%

04

Avios active

corporate accounts

THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN

Premium

vs. volume

Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.

Fleet

vs. cash

Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.

Alliance depth

vs. independence

Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.

ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS

Five live scenarios with no prep time.

Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.

EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR

Trust +

compliance

Corporate

lock-in

Heathrow +

Atlantic

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

02

Market share loss to Equinox

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

05

Fuel supply threatened

​

THE CURVEBALL

OUR RESPONSE

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

02

Market share loss to Equinox

Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

05

Fuel supply threatened

Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT

Premium differentiation

Faster boarding through security partnerships

Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges

Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences

A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers

Reinforce alliances

Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes

Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners

Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey

Secure fuel

Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options

Invest in sustainable aviation fuel

Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East

Fly newer, more efficient aircraft

FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK

HOW WE BUILT IT

Predicting competitors’ next moves.

We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.

I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.

FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE

WHAT THEY WANT

Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.

WHAT THEY’RE DOING

Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.

WHAT THEY ASSUME

Allegris, Lufthansa's customer-centric solution to personalized airfare, delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.

WHAT THEY CAN DO

Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.

The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT

1st of 6

Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.

RETROSPECTIVE

What I’d do differently.

01

Work the short-haul question through.

We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.

02

Get specific on winning corporate contracts.

The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.

THE PM TAKEAWAY

Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.

You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.

LET’S TALK

Building for real people at scale?

I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. The fastest way to reach me is LinkedIn.

NEXT CASE STUDY

Twofer →

Designing real-time demand for local businesses.

SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE

Winning the battle for

premium air travel

Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.

Competitive strategy

Scenario planning

Four Corners analysis

Resource allocation

1st place

MY ROLE

Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation

COMPANY

SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by industry experts

TIMELINE

Two-day live simulation

OUTCOMES

1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight

TEAM

A 6-person team with various industry backgrounds and strengths

ON THIS PAGE

OVERVIEW

A live war game, in two rounds.

The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.

THE TEAM

SMU Cox School of Business

Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright

IPADE Business School

Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo

Ochoa Rouhana

SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES

British Airways (us)

Emirates

Qatar Airways

Air India

Lufthansa

American Airlines

ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE

Build the strategy

Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.

→

ROUND 2 · REACTIVE

5 live crises, little prep

Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK

British Airways:

Strategic Plan 2026–2028

Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.

1st of 6

SMU Cox War Game · Team of six

THE CHALLENGE

British Airways is squeezed from every direction.

Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We contended BA should make none of the obvious moves.

HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND

Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.

WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS

A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.

ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY

Three strategic pillars.

HOW WE FRAMED IT

Five questions, answered in order.

We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.

1

FRAMING

What is our winning aspiration?

Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.

2

POSITIONING

Where will we play?

Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.

3

POSITIONING

How will we win?

Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.

4

ACTIVATION

What capabilities must we have?

Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.

5

ACTIVATION

What systems do we need?

Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.

HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS

​

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Low cost

Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper

Can’t match its structurally lower fares

Regulatory risk

US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk

Fully compliant Western carrier

Corporate access

None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched

Preferred carrier for Western multinationals

Loyalty

No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch

Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned

Track record

A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk

Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%

Hub strength

Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa

Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway

Geopolitics

Formed after failed Iran-US talks

UK and NATO aligned

Reputation

New, and a risk for US corporate clients

Safe, stable, premium, and punctual

Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.

01

PILLAR 01

Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.

Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

EQUINOX ALLIANCE

20 to 30% cheaper fuel

Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.

BRITISH AIRWAYS

Fully compliant

UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.

VS

THE TRADEOFF

We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.

02

PILLAR 02

Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.

Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.

14M

Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.

Faster Avios upgrades

Long-term corporate contracts

AI-driven personalization

Guaranteed fast-track security

THE TRADEOFF

Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.

03

PILLAR 03

Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.

Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.

43%

Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.

LHR

London Heathrow

JFK

New York

US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors

Asia-Europe: conceded

THE TRADEOFF

We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.

THE THREE-YEAR PLAN

How the pillars roll out.

2026

FIRST 6 MONTHS

Establish and intercept

Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.

2027

YEAR 2

Deepen and differentiate

Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.

2028

YEAR 3

Compound and defend

Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.

HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028

01

Premium cabin

load factor

02

Corporate account

retention

03

On-time performance

above 86%

04

Avios active

corporate accounts

THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN

Premium

vs. volume

Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.

Fleet

vs. cash

Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.

Alliance depth

vs. independence

Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.

ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS

Five live scenarios with no prep time.

Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.

EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR

Trust +

compliance

Corporate

lock-in

Heathrow +

Atlantic

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

02

Market share loss to Equinox

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

05

Fuel supply threatened

​

THE CURVEBALL

OUR RESPONSE

01

Regulatory pressure on Equinox

Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

02

Market share loss to Equinox

Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

03

Lufthansa defects to Equinox

Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in

04

Equinox dominates by 2028

Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.

Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic

05

Fuel supply threatened

Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.

Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance

OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT

Premium differentiation

Faster boarding through security partnerships

Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges

Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences

A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers

Reinforce alliances

Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes

Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners

Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey

Secure fuel

Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options

Invest in sustainable aviation fuel

Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East

Fly newer, more efficient aircraft

FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK

HOW WE BUILT IT

Predicting competitors’ next moves.

We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.

I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.

FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE

WHAT THEY WANT

Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.

WHAT THEY’RE DOING

Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.

WHAT THEY ASSUME

Allegris, Lufthansa's customer-centric solution to personalized airfare, delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.

WHAT THEY CAN DO

Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.

The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT

1st of 6

Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.

RETROSPECTIVE

What I’d do differently.

01

Work the short-haul question through.

We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.

02

Get specific on winning corporate contracts.

The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.

THE PM TAKEAWAY

Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.

You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.

LET’S TALK

Building for real people at scale?

I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. The fastest way to reach me is LinkedIn.

NEXT CASE STUDY

Twofer →

Designing real-time demand for local businesses.