SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE
Winning the battle for premium air travel
Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.
Competitive strategy
Scenario planning
Four Corners analysis
Resource allocation
1st place
MY ROLE
Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation
COMPANY
SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by faculty and industry
TIMELINE
Two-day live simulation
OUTCOMES
1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight
TEAM
Team #2 with Aditya Mehta, Karla Muñoz, Juan Pablo Ochoa Rouhana, Itziar Olóriz, and Trenton Bright

OVERVIEW
A live war game, in two rounds.
The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.
THE TEAM
SMU Cox School of Business
Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright
IPADE Business School
Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo
Ochoa Rouhana
SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES
British Airways (us)
Emirates
Qatar Airways
Air India
Lufthansa
American Airlines
ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE
Build the strategy
Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.
→
ROUND 2 · REACTIVE
5 live crises, little prep
Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK
British Airways:
Strategic Plan 2026–2028
Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.
1st of 6
SMU Cox War Game · Team of six
THE CHALLENGE
British Airways is squeezed from every direction.
Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We argued BA should make none of the obvious moves.
HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.
ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY
Three strategic pillars.
HOW WE FRAMED IT
Five questions, answered in order.
We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.
1
FRAMING
What is our winning aspiration?
Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.
2
POSITIONING
Where will we play?
Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.
3
POSITIONING
How will we win?
Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.
4
ACTIVATION
What capabilities must we have?
Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.
5
ACTIVATION
What systems do we need?
Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.
HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Low cost
Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper
Can’t match its structurally lower fares
Regulatory risk
US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk
Fully compliant Western carrier
Corporate access
None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched
Preferred carrier for Western multinationals
Loyalty
No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch
Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned
Track record
A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk
Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%
Hub strength
Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa
Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway
Geopolitics
Formed after failed Iran-US talks
UK and NATO aligned
Reputation
New, and a risk for US corporate clients
Safe, stable, premium, and punctual
Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.
01
PILLAR 01
Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.
Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
20 to 30% cheaper fuel
Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Fully compliant
UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
VS
THE TRADEOFF
We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.
02
PILLAR 02
Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.
Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.
14M
Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.
Faster Avios upgrades
Long-term corporate contracts
AI-driven personalization
Guaranteed fast-track security
THE TRADEOFF
Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.
03
PILLAR 03
Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.
Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.
43%
Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.
LHR
London Heathrow
JFK
New York
US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors
Asia-Europe: conceded
THE TRADEOFF
We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.
THE THREE-YEAR PLAN
How the pillars roll out.
2026
FIRST 6 MONTHS
Establish and intercept
Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.
2027
YEAR 2
Deepen and differentiate
Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.
2028
YEAR 3
Compound and defend
Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.
HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028
01
Premium cabin
load factor
02
Corporate account
retention
03
On-time performance
above 86%
04
Avios active
corporate accounts
THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN
Premium
vs. volume
Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.
Fleet
vs. cash
Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.
Alliance depth
vs. independence
Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.
ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS
Five live scenarios with no prep time.
Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.
EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR
Trust +
compliance
Corporate
lock-in
Heathrow +
Atlantic
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
02
Market share loss to Equinox
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
05
Fuel supply threatened
THE CURVEBALL
OUR RESPONSE
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
02
Market share loss to Equinox
Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
05
Fuel supply threatened
Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT
Premium differentiation
Faster boarding through security partnerships
Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges
Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences
A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers
Reinforce alliances
Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes
Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners
Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey
Secure fuel
Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options
Invest in sustainable aviation fuel
Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East
Fly newer, more efficient aircraft
FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK



HOW WE BUILT IT
Predicting competitors’ next moves.
We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.
I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.
FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE
WHAT THEY WANT
Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.
WHAT THEY’RE DOING
Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.
WHAT THEY ASSUME
Allegris delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.
WHAT THEY CAN DO
Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.
The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT
1st of 6
Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.
RETROSPECTIVE
What I’d do differently.
01
Work the short-haul question through.
We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.
02
Get specific on winning corporate contracts.
The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.
THE PM TAKEAWAY
Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.
You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.
LET’S TALK
Building for real people
at scale?
I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. LinkedIn is the fastest way to reach me.
NEXT CASE STUDY
Twofer →
Designing real-time demand for local businesses.
SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE
Winning the battle for premium air travel
Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.
Competitive strategy
Scenario planning
Four Corners analysis
Resource allocation
1st place
MY ROLE
Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation
COMPANY
SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by faculty and industry
TIMELINE
Two-day live simulation
OUTCOMES
1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight
TEAM
A 6-person team with various industry backgrounds and strengths

OVERVIEW
A live war game, in two rounds.
The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.
THE TEAM
SMU Cox School of Business
Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright
IPADE Business School
Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo
Ochoa Rouhana
SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES
British Airways (us)
Emirates
Qatar Airways
Air India
Lufthansa
American Airlines
ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE
Build the strategy
Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.
→
ROUND 2 · REACTIVE
5 live crises, little prep
Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK
British Airways:
Strategic Plan 2026–2028
Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.
1st of 6
SMU Cox War Game · Team of six
THE CHALLENGE
British Airways is squeezed from every direction.
Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We contended BA should make none of the obvious moves.
HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.
ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY
Three strategic pillars.
HOW WE FRAMED IT
Five questions, answered in order.
We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.
1
FRAMING
What is our winning aspiration?
Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.
2
POSITIONING
Where will we play?
Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.
3
POSITIONING
How will we win?
Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.
4
ACTIVATION
What capabilities must we have?
Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.
5
ACTIVATION
What systems do we need?
Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.
HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Low cost
Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper
Can’t match its structurally lower fares
Regulatory risk
US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk
Fully compliant Western carrier
Corporate access
None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched
Preferred carrier for Western multinationals
Loyalty
No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch
Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned
Track record
A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk
Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%
Hub strength
Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa
Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway
Geopolitics
Formed after failed Iran-US talks
UK and NATO aligned
Reputation
New, and a risk for US corporate clients
Safe, stable, premium, and punctual
Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.
01
PILLAR 01
Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.
Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
20 to 30% cheaper fuel
Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Fully compliant
UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
VS
THE TRADEOFF
We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.
02
PILLAR 02
Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.
Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.
14M
Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.
Faster Avios upgrades
Long-term corporate contracts
AI-driven personalization
Guaranteed fast-track security
THE TRADEOFF
Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.
03
PILLAR 03
Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.
Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.
43%
Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.
LHR
London Heathrow
JFK
New York
US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors
Asia-Europe: conceded
THE TRADEOFF
We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.
THE THREE-YEAR PLAN
How the pillars roll out.
2026
FIRST 6 MONTHS
Establish and intercept
Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.
2027
YEAR 2
Deepen and differentiate
Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.
2028
YEAR 3
Compound and defend
Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.
HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028
01
Premium cabin
load factor
02
Corporate account
retention
03
On-time performance
above 86%
04
Avios active
corporate accounts
THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN
Premium
vs. volume
Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.
Fleet
vs. cash
Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.
Alliance depth
vs. independence
Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.
ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS
Five live scenarios with no prep time.
Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.
EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR
Trust +
compliance
Corporate
lock-in
Heathrow +
Atlantic
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
02
Market share loss to Equinox
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
05
Fuel supply threatened
THE CURVEBALL
OUR RESPONSE
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
02
Market share loss to Equinox
Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
05
Fuel supply threatened
Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT
Premium differentiation
Faster boarding through security partnerships
Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges
Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences
A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers
Reinforce alliances
Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes
Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners
Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey
Secure fuel
Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options
Invest in sustainable aviation fuel
Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East
Fly newer, more efficient aircraft
FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK



HOW WE BUILT IT
Predicting competitors’ next moves.
We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.
I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.
FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE
WHAT THEY WANT
Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.
WHAT THEY’RE DOING
Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.
WHAT THEY ASSUME
Allegris, Lufthansa's customer-centric solution to personalized airfare, delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.
WHAT THEY CAN DO
Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.
The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT
1st of 6
Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.
RETROSPECTIVE
What I’d do differently.
01
Work the short-haul question through.
We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.
02
Get specific on winning corporate contracts.
The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.
THE PM TAKEAWAY
Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.
You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.
LET’S TALK
Building for real people
at scale?
I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. LinkedIn is the fastest way to reach me.
NEXT CASE STUDY
Twofer →
Designing real-time demand for local businesses.
SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE
Winning the battle for
premium air travel
Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.
Competitive strategy
Scenario planning
Four Corners analysis
Resource allocation
1st place
MY ROLE
Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation
COMPANY
SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by industry experts
TIMELINE
Two-day live simulation
OUTCOMES
1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight
TEAM
A 6-person team with various industry backgrounds and strengths

OVERVIEW
A live war game, in two rounds.
The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.
THE TEAM
SMU Cox School of Business
Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright
IPADE Business School
Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo
Ochoa Rouhana
SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES
British Airways (us)
Emirates
Qatar Airways
Air India
Lufthansa
American Airlines
ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE
Build the strategy
Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.
→
ROUND 2 · REACTIVE
5 live crises, little prep
Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK
British Airways:
Strategic Plan 2026–2028
Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.
1st of 6
SMU Cox War Game · Team of six
THE CHALLENGE
British Airways is squeezed from every direction.
Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We contended BA should make none of the obvious moves.
HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.
ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY
Three strategic pillars.
HOW WE FRAMED IT
Five questions, answered in order.
We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.
1
FRAMING
What is our winning aspiration?
Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.
2
POSITIONING
Where will we play?
Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.
3
POSITIONING
How will we win?
Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.
4
ACTIVATION
What capabilities must we have?
Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.
5
ACTIVATION
What systems do we need?
Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.
HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Low cost
Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper
Can’t match its structurally lower fares
Regulatory risk
US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk
Fully compliant Western carrier
Corporate access
None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched
Preferred carrier for Western multinationals
Loyalty
No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch
Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned
Track record
A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk
Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%
Hub strength
Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa
Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway
Geopolitics
Formed after failed Iran-US talks
UK and NATO aligned
Reputation
New, and a risk for US corporate clients
Safe, stable, premium, and punctual
Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.
01
PILLAR 01
Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.
Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
20 to 30% cheaper fuel
Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Fully compliant
UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
VS
THE TRADEOFF
We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.
02
PILLAR 02
Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.
Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.
14M
Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.
Faster Avios upgrades
Long-term corporate contracts
AI-driven personalization
Guaranteed fast-track security
THE TRADEOFF
Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.
03
PILLAR 03
Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.
Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.
43%
Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.
LHR
London Heathrow
JFK
New York
US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors
Asia-Europe: conceded
THE TRADEOFF
We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.
THE THREE-YEAR PLAN
How the pillars roll out.
2026
FIRST 6 MONTHS
Establish and intercept
Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.
2027
YEAR 2
Deepen and differentiate
Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.
2028
YEAR 3
Compound and defend
Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.
HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028
01
Premium cabin
load factor
02
Corporate account
retention
03
On-time performance
above 86%
04
Avios active
corporate accounts
THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN
Premium
vs. volume
Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.
Fleet
vs. cash
Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.
Alliance depth
vs. independence
Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.
ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS
Five live scenarios with no prep time.
Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.
EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR
Trust +
compliance
Corporate
lock-in
Heathrow +
Atlantic
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
02
Market share loss to Equinox
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
05
Fuel supply threatened
THE CURVEBALL
OUR RESPONSE
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
02
Market share loss to Equinox
Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
05
Fuel supply threatened
Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT
Premium differentiation
Faster boarding through security partnerships
Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges
Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences
A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers
Reinforce alliances
Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes
Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners
Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey
Secure fuel
Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options
Invest in sustainable aviation fuel
Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East
Fly newer, more efficient aircraft
FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK



HOW WE BUILT IT
Predicting competitors’ next moves.
We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.
I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.
FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE
WHAT THEY WANT
Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.
WHAT THEY’RE DOING
Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.
WHAT THEY ASSUME
Allegris, Lufthansa's customer-centric solution to personalized airfare, delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.
WHAT THEY CAN DO
Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.
The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT
1st of 6
Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.
RETROSPECTIVE
What I’d do differently.
01
Work the short-haul question through.
We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.
02
Get specific on winning corporate contracts.
The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.
THE PM TAKEAWAY
Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.
You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.
LET’S TALK
Building for real people at scale?
I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. The fastest way to reach me is LinkedIn.
NEXT CASE STUDY
Twofer →
Designing real-time demand for local businesses.
SMU COX MBA · COMPETITIVE STRATEGY · 1ST PLACE
Winning the battle for
premium air travel
Our team built and defended a 3-year competitive strategy for British Airways in a live war game. We analyzed five global competitors, responded to five live crisis scenarios, and took first place against five other MBA teams.
Competitive strategy
Scenario planning
Four Corners analysis
Resource allocation
1st place
MY ROLE
Strategy development, competitive analysis, scenario planning, presentation
COMPANY
SMU Cox MBA War Game. 6 teams, 2 rounds, judged by industry experts
TIMELINE
Two-day live simulation
OUTCOMES
1st place. Scored on insight, accuracy, creativity, and foresight
TEAM
A 6-person team with various industry backgrounds and strengths

ON THIS PAGE
OVERVIEW
A live war game, in two rounds.
The SMU Cox War Game gives MBA teams a real company and a competitive briefing book, then asks them to do what strategy teams do: decide where to play, how to win, and what to do when the market moves against you. Round 1 was our proactive strategy. Round 2 was reactive: five live scenarios from the judges, with little prep time.
THE TEAM
SMU Cox School of Business
Dallas, Texas

Vanessa Sambrano

Aditya Mehta

Trenton Bright
IPADE Business School
Monterrey, Mexico

Itziar Olóriz

Karla Muñoz

Juan Pablo
Ochoa Rouhana
SIX TEAMS, SIX AIRLINES
British Airways (us)
Emirates
Qatar Airways
Air India
Lufthansa
American Airlines
ROUND 1 · PROACTIVE
Build the strategy
Where to play, how to win, defended in front of faculty and industry judges.
→
ROUND 2 · REACTIVE
5 live crises, little prep
Judges dropped scenarios mid-competition. We had minutes to respond.

OUR ROUND 1 DECK
British Airways:
Strategic Plan 2026–2028
Build premium leadership, strengthen financial performance, and shape the future of long-haul aviation.
1st of 6
SMU Cox War Game · Team of six
THE CHALLENGE
British Airways is squeezed from every direction.
Gulf carriers were outspending BA on product and pulling premium connecting traffic. Low-cost carriers were eating short-haul margins. Air India and Lufthansa were fighting for the same corporate accounts. Then the brief added the Equinox Alliance: 15 airlines using discounted, geopolitically risky fuel to undercut Western carriers on price. We contended BA should make none of the obvious moves.
HOW THE FIVE COMPETITORS WILL RESPOND

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Defend its premium corporate base by leaning into reliability, network breadth, and premium differentiation rather than price.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Most likely to make the same strategic pivot as BA, which means BA has to prove Heathrow reliability and service consistency are better.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Protect corporate contracts and transatlantic premium demand through U.S. relationships, loyalty, and premium product improvements.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
American can match BA on business traveler relevance from the U.S. side, even if BA has the Heathrow advantage.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Use its premium brand and reputation to stay above the pricing battle, while using its product and scale to defend long-haul premium traffic.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Less of a direct threat to BA’s reliability-led North Atlantic strategy, but it raises what customers expect from a premium experience.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Keep modernizing and growing its long-haul network. Its location could make it a candidate to join Equinox.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
Could become more competitive if it improves both product and execution. A medium-term watch item more than a direct threat.

HOW THEY’LL RESPOND
Compete on premium service and strong connectivity, capturing value through the onboard experience instead of nonstop simplicity.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR BRITISH AIRWAYS
A real challenge because it combines high-end premium perception with broad network reach. It could also look to deepen partnerships.
ROUND 1 · OUR STRATEGY
Three strategic pillars.
HOW WE FRAMED IT
Five questions, answered in order.
We used a Strategic Cascade so every recommendation traced back to one winning aspiration.
1
FRAMING
What is our winning aspiration?
Lead premium travel on transatlantic routes.
2
POSITIONING
Where will we play?
Premium and business travel between the US and UK, where demand, yield and frequency are highest.
3
POSITIONING
How will we win?
Heathrow’s central position, reliability, corporate contracts, oneworld and loyalty data.
4
ACTIVATION
What capabilities must we have?
Operational excellence, AI-driven automation and sharper customer segmentation.
5
ACTIVATION
What systems do we need?
Integrated CRM, pricing and corporate sales to protect premium revenue.
HEAD TO HEAD: EQUINOX VS. BRITISH AIRWAYS
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Low cost
Discounted aviation fuel, 20 to 30% cheaper
Can’t match its structurally lower fares
Regulatory risk
US and EU regulators flagging concerns, with landing rights at risk
Fully compliant Western carrier
Corporate access
None yet. The alliance hasn’t launched
Preferred carrier for Western multinationals
Loyalty
No loyalty program, customer data, or personalization at launch
Years of customer lifetime value data, with AI personalization planned
Track record
A new alliance of 15 carriers on 4 continents, with high coordination risk
Highest on-time record in its history, at 86%
Hub strength
Strong in Asia, Latin America, and Africa
Heathrow, the world’s top business city gateway
Geopolitics
Formed after failed Iran-US talks
UK and NATO aligned
Reputation
New, and a risk for US corporate clients
Safe, stable, premium, and punctual
Bold marks the side with the edge. Equinox wins on price alone, which is why we chose not to compete there.
01
PILLAR 01
Compete on trust and compliance instead of price.
Equinox’s cost edge came from fuel tied to sanctioned states. That is also a regulatory and reputational liability. We positioned BA as the fully compliant, UK and NATO-aligned premium carrier, and made that a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
EQUINOX ALLIANCE
20 to 30% cheaper fuel
Tied to sanctioned states: a regulatory and reputational liability.
BRITISH AIRWAYS
Fully compliant
UK and NATO aligned. Turned into a sales tool for corporate travel managers.
VS
THE TRADEOFF
We ceded price competition entirely, betting corporate buyers value reliability over price and that regulation would slow Equinox first.
02
PILLAR 02
Deepen corporate lock-in before Equinox builds its own.
Equinox launched with no loyalty program and no personalization. We recommended moves that raise the cost of switching away from BA.
14M
Executive Club members to lock in. Equinox had zero loyalty program.
Faster Avios upgrades
Long-term corporate contracts
AI-driven personalization
Guaranteed fast-track security
THE TRADEOFF
Investing in loyalty while cutting costs elsewhere was a real tension. We protected the revenue base first.
03
PILLAR 03
Double down on Heathrow and the Atlantic corridor.
Instead of competing everywhere, BA should win decisively where it is structurally advantaged: its Heathrow hub and the US-UK business corridor.
43%
Heathrow slot share, a hub advantage no rival can copy.
LHR
London Heathrow
JFK
New York
US-UK: one of the busiest business corridors
Asia-Europe: conceded
THE TRADEOFF
We accepted exposure on Asia-Europe routes where Gulf hubs are stronger. It was a resource call as much as a competitive one.
THE THREE-YEAR PLAN
How the pillars roll out.
2026
FIRST 6 MONTHS
Establish and intercept
Turn Middle East turbulence into inbound traffic through Heathrow.
2027
YEAR 2
Deepen and differentiate
Turn captured traffic into lasting corporate relationships.
2028
YEAR 3
Compound and defend
Use loyalty data as a competitive advantage rivals can’t copy.
HOW WE’D MEASURE IT BY 2028
01
Premium cabin
load factor
02
Corporate account
retention
03
On-time performance
above 86%
04
Avios active
corporate accounts
THE TRADE-OFFS WE HAD TO OWN
Premium
vs. volume
Move capacity to higher-yield long-haul routes and trim weak short-haul flying.
Fleet
vs. cash
Renew the fleet to cut operating costs and improve ESG performance.
Alliance depth
vs. independence
Deepen joint ventures on the Atlantic while staying agile in growth markets.
ROUND 2 · LIVE SCENARIOS
Five live scenarios with no prep time.
Our Round 1 strategy held up because we had mapped our assumptions carefully. Each response came straight from the three pillars.
EVERY LIVE RESPONSE TRACED BACK TO A PILLAR
Trust +
compliance
Corporate
lock-in
Heathrow +
Atlantic
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
02
Market share loss to Equinox
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
05
Fuel supply threatened
THE CURVEBALL
OUR RESPONSE
01
Regulatory pressure on Equinox
Lock in corporate accounts now and use the regulatory story as an active sales tool.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
02
Market share loss to Equinox
Use Equinox’s coordination risk against it. Reliability wins the segment that matters.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
03
Lufthansa defects to Equinox
Position Heathrow as the stable Western hub and make switching costly through Avios.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
Pillar 02 · Corporate lock-in
04
Equinox dominates by 2028
Don’t chase scale. Concede Asia and LatAm, defend the Atlantic absolutely.
Pillar 03 · Heathrow + Atlantic
05
Fuel supply threatened
Make hedging a priority and position BA as the resilient choice if the alliance fractures.
Pillar 01 · Trust + compliance
OUR CALL WHEN EQUINOX LAUNCHED: DON’T JOIN, OUTPLAY IT
Premium differentiation
Faster boarding through security partnerships
Private, video-ready meeting pods in lounges
Service that knows each customer’s name and preferences
A guaranteed fast-track security lane for premium passengers
Reinforce alliances
Expand joint ventures, especially on US routes
Tighter connectivity and coordination with partners
Corporate travel contracts with firms like Goldman Sachs and McKinsey
Secure fuel
Lock in long-term prices with swaps and options
Invest in sustainable aviation fuel
Diversify supply across Europe, the US and the Middle East
Fly newer, more efficient aircraft
FROM OUR ROUND 2 DECK



HOW WE BUILT IT
Predicting competitors’ next moves.
We ran a Four Corners analysis on Lufthansa, American, Emirates, Air India, and Qatar: each one’s goals, current strategy, management assumptions, and real capabilities. Lufthansa was the clearest case. It was betting on a premium cabin rollout and acquisition synergies, but the rollout was slow and the integration costly. That gap between assumption and capability was BA’s opening on corporate accounts.
I use the same thinking in product work: compare what users assume a product does with what it delivers. The opportunity sits in that gap.
FOUR CORNERS IN ACTION: LUFTHANSA’S EXECUTION SQUEEZE
WHAT THEY WANT
Premium leadership with Allegris, scale through ITA, restored profitability, protected DACH corporate share.
WHAT THEY’RE DOING
Allegris rollout is slow, ITA integration is costly, code-shares are expanding, targeting a €1.5B turnaround.
WHAT THEY ASSUME
Allegris, Lufthansa's customer-centric solution to personalized airfare, delays are manageable, DACH loyalty will hold, ITA synergies arrive fast, the turnaround lands smoothly.
WHAT THEY CAN DO
Strong multi-hub network and Star Alliance, but losses, labor strain and no transatlantic JV.
The gap between what Lufthansa assumes and what it can deliver is where BA wins corporate accounts.

RESULT
1st of 6
Our team never tried to beat Equinox at its own game. Most of the teams that lost tried to answer each threat at once and ended up with a longer strategy instead of a sharper one.
RETROSPECTIVE
What I’d do differently.
01
Work the short-haul question through.
We recommended trimming marginal short-haul routes but didn’t define which routes, on what timeline, or the effect on feeder traffic to long-haul.
02
Get specific on winning corporate contracts.
The sales motion and incentives to displace competitors stayed high level. In a real engagement, that is where the work lives.
THE PM TAKEAWAY
Strategy means choosing where to put limited resources.
You can’t invest in everything or serve every user equally well. In a war game or a roadmap, I look for where we’re structurally advantaged, commit there, and treat exposure elsewhere as a choice we made on purpose.
LET’S TALK
Building for real people at scale?
I’m looking for an Associate Product Manager role on a team like yours. The fastest way to reach me is LinkedIn.
NEXT CASE STUDY
Twofer →
Designing real-time demand for local businesses.